“Diffuse ionized gas”的版本间差异

来自Shiyin's note
跳到导航 跳到搜索
无编辑摘要
无编辑摘要
第3行: 第3行:
*Referred to as the Reynolds layer, or warm ionized medium (WIM);
*Referred to as the Reynolds layer, or warm ionized medium (WIM);
*This warm (10^4 K), diffuse (n ~ 0.2 cm~3) gas fills 20% of the disk volume and accounts for most of the mass of ionized gas(90 percent).
*This warm (10^4 K), diffuse (n ~ 0.2 cm~3) gas fills 20% of the disk volume and accounts for most of the mass of ionized gas(90 percent).
:*[[electron density|电子密度比]]hot gas要高一点( Typical values of the central electron density, central cooling time and total mass for the ETGs are ~ 0.1cm−3, ~ 5 x 10^6 yr and 5 x 1O^9 M⊙)
:*[[electron density|电子密度比]] hot gas要高一点( Typical values of the central electron density, central cooling time and total mass for the ETGs are ~ 0.1cm−3, ~ 5 x 10^6 yr and 5 x 1O^9 M⊙)
*In terms of energetics, the Galactic WIM requires at least 10^42 ergs s~1 to remain ionized. This power is more than can be comfortably supplied by supernova shocks, but significantly less than the [[Lyman continuum]] luminosity of massive stars.
*In terms of energetics, the Galactic WIM requires at least 10^42 ergs s~1 to remain ionized. This power is more than can be comfortably supplied by supernova shocks, but significantly less than the [[Lyman continuum]] luminosity of massive stars.
*[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/306232/meta]
*[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/306232/meta]

2016年6月15日 (三) 03:09的版本

电子温度

银河系中的DIG

  • Referred to as the Reynolds layer, or warm ionized medium (WIM);
  • This warm (10^4 K), diffuse (n ~ 0.2 cm~3) gas fills 20% of the disk volume and accounts for most of the mass of ionized gas(90 percent).
  • 电子密度比 hot gas要高一点( Typical values of the central electron density, central cooling time and total mass for the ETGs are ~ 0.1cm−3, ~ 5 x 10^6 yr and 5 x 1O^9 M⊙)
  • In terms of energetics, the Galactic WIM requires at least 10^42 ergs s~1 to remain ionized. This power is more than can be comfortably supplied by supernova shocks, but significantly less than the Lyman continuum luminosity of massive stars.
  • [1]