Difference between revisions of "ALFALFA and MaNGA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== ALFALFA & MaNGA match == Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell....") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== ALFALFA & MaNGA match == | == ALFALFA & MaNGA match == | ||
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell.edu/hiarchive/alfalfa/] | Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell.edu/hiarchive/alfalfa/] | ||
I also supplemented the SDSS information | I also supplemented the SDSS information to ALFALFA <math>\alpha</math>40 catalog through PhotoObjID. | ||
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that SDSS | To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that the SDSS catalog has changed the galaxy properties a little bit after DR7, ALFALFA might used the old value (DR7). | ||
*I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows. | |||
[[File:spacedistrib_magalf.pdf]] | |||
*The stellar mass distribution | |||
[[File:Msditrib_magalf.pdf]] | |||
*The redshift distribtuion | |||
[[File:zdistrib_magalf.pdf]] | |||
*The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution | |||
[[File:r90r50distrib_magalf.pdf]] | |||
Revision as of 08:56, 18 December 2014
ALFALFA & MaNGA match
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and 40 of ALFALFA.[1] I also supplemented the SDSS information to ALFALFA 40 catalog through PhotoObjID.
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that the SDSS catalog has changed the galaxy properties a little bit after DR7, ALFALFA might used the old value (DR7).
- I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows.
- The stellar mass distribution
- The redshift distribtuion
- The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution