“ALFALFA and MaNGA”的版本间差异
跳到导航
跳到搜索
| 第6行： | 第6行： | ||
*I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows. |
*I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows. |
||
[[File:spacedistrib_magalf. |
[[File:spacedistrib_magalf.jpg]] |
||
*The stellar mass distribution |
*The stellar mass distribution |
||
[[File:Msditrib_magalf. |
[[File:Msditrib_magalf.jpg]] |
||
*The redshift distribtuion |
*The redshift distribtuion |
||
[[File:zdistrib_magalf. |
[[File:zdistrib_magalf.jpg]] |
||
*The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution |
*The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution |
||
[[File:r90r50distrib_magalf. |
[[File:r90r50distrib_magalf.jpg]] |
||
2014年12月18日 (四) 09:05的版本
ALFALFA & MaNGA match
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and 40 of ALFALFA.[1] I also supplemented the SDSS information to ALFALFA 40 catalog through PhotoObjID.
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented to ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in the ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that the SDSS catalog has changed the galaxy properties a little bit after DR7, ALFALFA might used the old value (DR7).
- I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows.
- The stellar mass distribution
- The redshift distribtuion
- The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution
