“ALFALFA and MaNGA”的版本间差异
跳到导航
跳到搜索
（Created page with "== ALFALFA & MaNGA match == Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell...."） |
|||
| 第1行： | 第1行： | ||
== ALFALFA & MaNGA match == |
== ALFALFA & MaNGA match == |
||
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell.edu/hiarchive/alfalfa/] |
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and <math>\alpha</math>40 of ALFALFA.[http://arecibo.tc.cornell.edu/hiarchive/alfalfa/] |
||
I also supplemented the SDSS information |
I also supplemented the SDSS information to ALFALFA <math>\alpha</math>40 catalog through PhotoObjID. |
||
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that |
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that the SDSS catalog has changed the galaxy properties a little bit after DR7, ALFALFA might used the old value (DR7). |
||
*I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows. |
|||
[[File:spacedistrib_magalf.pdf]] |
|||
*The stellar mass distribution |
|||
[[File:Msditrib_magalf.pdf]] |
|||
*The redshift distribtuion |
|||
[[File:zdistrib_magalf.pdf]] |
|||
*The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution |
|||
[[File:r90r50distrib_magalf.pdf]] |
|||
2014年12月18日 (四) 08:56的版本
ALFALFA & MaNGA match
Here, I used the v1_2_0 version catalog of MaNGA "MaNGA_targets_extNSA_tiled.fits" and 40 of ALFALFA.[1] I also supplemented the SDSS information to ALFALFA 40 catalog through PhotoObjID.
To match these two catalogs, I chosed "RA"&"DEC" in MaNGA catalog, and "ra"&"dec" given by SDSS which had been supplemented ALFALFA catalog. I did not use "RAdeg_OC" and "DECdeg_OC" in ALFALFA catalog because they are different with the SDSS ra & dec for the same PhotoObjID object. It could because that the SDSS catalog has changed the galaxy properties a little bit after DR7, ALFALFA might used the old value (DR7).
- I got 2300 matched sources within 3", the spatial distribution is as follows.
- The stellar mass distribution
- The redshift distribtuion
- The r-band petromag r90/r50 distribution